Image Credit: Ralph Dominguez/MediaPunch /IPX.Īt the height of her career in the ’80s, Kim Basinger posed for Playboy for the magazine’s February 1983 issue.įor the January 1985 issue, Goldie Hawn posed in a giant martini glass on the cover of Playboy. Another couple of decades went by before Parton actually donned her bunny ears again and recreated her cover just for her husband’s birthday. One of the first women to grace the cover was none other than Marilyn Monroe, photographed here for the magazine.ĭecades later, country singer Dolly Parton made her Playboy debut in 1978. Playboy’s first issue came out in December 1953. © 2024 NYP Holdings, Inc.Image Credit: MEGA / Julien's Auctions / MEGA. “The message they are sending is, ‘This is not your mother’s coffee stand,’” she said.Ī final ruling has not yet been reported. Judge Sandra Ikuta agreed, stating she was concerned that customers would see the women working as saying: “I am sexually available,” the Herald Net reported.Īccording to the publication, Ebelhar defended the baristas’ choice of outfits as personal expression, female empowerment and a form of body positivity. Ramerman argued it was the city’s responsibility to combat prostitution or illegal sexual activity - messages he claimed the bikini barista coffee stand was sending. US Circuit Judge Morgan Christen seemed to agree, asking, “How can law enforcement determine where the bottom half is and measure it?” Courthouse News reported.Īssistant city attorney Ramsey Ramerman disagreed with the questioning, saying that the legislation was specifically worded, and argued that Edge understood what the new dress code law allowed. Jovanna Edge, owner of Hillbilly Hotties, one of several bikini barista coffee shops involved in the suit, and attorney Melinda Ebelhar argued that the order was intentionally vague and would be too difficult to enforce.Įbelhar claimed it would take “advanced math” to figure out whether the bottom half of the anal cleft was exposed. The court finds that the dress code ordinance likely violates plaintiffs’ right to free expression under the First Amendment,” Pechman wrote in the injunction order, Courthouse News reported. “The term ‘bottom one-half of the anal cleft’ is not well-defined or reasonably understandable, and the ordinances otherwise fail to provide clear guidance and raise risks of arbitrary enforcement. US District Judge Marsha Pechman approved the injunction during litigation, ruling the ordinance likely violates the bikini baristas’ First and 14th Amendment rights. How much “anal cleft” is one allowed to show while at work? That’s the question one Washington state court is trying to answer.Ī US Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing an ongoing legal saga between bikini baristas and the city of Everett over the anatomical phrase “anal cleft” and whether dress codes imposed on businesses violate their civil rights.īoth sides appeared in court Monday to further argue the city’s ordinance, which was passed August 2017, that restricts what employees of “quick-service” restaurants wear by requiring that the “bottom one-half of the anal cleft” be covered, Herald Net reported.Īccording to the ordinance, employees who work at fast food restaurants, food trucks and coffee stands are required to wear at least a tank top and shorts while at work. Shake Shack launches chicken nuggets nationwide KFC offering Colonel Sanders bearskin rug as part of Valentine's Day giveaway Couple takes wedding photos at Cracker Barrel where they first met
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |